| September 1, 1997 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
BY PRABHU CHAWLA Punish or Perish Gujral shifts from persuasive to combative politics.
It took more than 100 days in office for Gujral to make a shift from persuasive to combative politics. For the past three months, his foes were able to push Gujral into total inaction and abject surrender. For example, the CPI(M, led by its wily General Secretary Harkishen Singh Surjeet, succeeded in tarnishing the image of the prime minister by accusing him of shielding the corrupt by stonewalling actions against Congress President Sitaram Kesri and former Bihar chief minister Laloo Prasad Yadav. Like many of his predecessors, Gujral's response was quite predictable. In the past, other prime ministers have effectively used the corruption card either to silence their critics or establish their leadership. Confronted with a powerful threat to her, Indira Gandhi painted the 'syndicate' as a bunch of corrupt leaders who were out to sabotage her socialist and pro-poor economic policies. Sixteen years later in 1985, her son Rajiv Gandhi launched a frontal assault on his enemies within and without by threatening penal action against power brokers. And Vishwanath Pratap Singh rode triumphantly into South Block on the promise of rooting out the corrupt from the system. Instead, all of them were voted out of power leaving behind a more corrupt system than what they had inherited. But Gujral is confident of proving them wrong. By embarking on a risky course he is ignoring the ground realities. The success of any radical action plan requires:
In addition, by egging on the prime minister to take this initiative, his promoters have put him through a litmus test. Is the man at the top capable of continually driving the vast and decrepit machine forward at full speed? Losing momentum subsequently will not merely mean a stop, but a steep fall for the prime minister. But Gujral is a politician who would rather be consistent than right. |
|
© Living Media India Ltd |