![]() |
| April 10, 2000 | ||
|
|
| Affirmative
Inaction Little merit in a runaway quota system
There is no disputing the historical iniquities suffered by SCs and STs -- but is the present mechanism of reservations doing anything to benefit the poorest of the poor? Without a strictly economic parameter the quota system can never be foolproof. What it has done is to create a sub-elite among the traditionally indigent classes. There is no provision, for instance, to prevent the same family from using the reservation facility for, say, more than three generations. It is ridiculous to treat the daughter of an sc secretary to the Government of India at par with the son of a Dalit labourer in, well, Jehanabad. Injecting a dose of rationality into affirmative action will only hasten the journey to social equity. Rather than take piecemeal decisions on reservations, shouldn't the Government study the Indian experience with the quota system in its entirety? Perhaps the Constitutional Review Committee could finally be gainfully employed. Grow up India Less
than a week after Bill Clinton left India, the very circles that acclaimed
his visit are decrying "American racism". Even a term as
mothballed as "apartheid" is back in currency -- all because NRI
filmmaker Manoj Night Shyamalan didn't win an It is nobody's case Shyamalan has not produced a remarkably different, and commercially successful, psychological thriller. In sidestepping The Sixth Sense the Motion Picture Academy may well have erred. Indeed, even Orson Welles' Citizen Kane -- arguably the greatest film ever made -- was a failure at the Oscar ceremony in 1941. If nothing else, Shyamalan is in good company. What isn't quite as agreeable is the tetchy reaction back in his homeland. Just days after putting up a grand show about being a self-confident nation, does India have to go berserk only because one Shyamalan doesn't win an Oscar? Talk of Sense and hyper-sensitivity. |
|
||||
| Top |
© Living Media India Ltd |