|
VIEWPOINT: FIFTH COLUMN
Living Off Gandhi
Why does the Fourth Estate defend systems that rob
in the name of the poor?
By Tavleen Singh
There
is a tired old adage in government circles that goes like this: do nothing
and nobody will bother you; do something-anything-and you could attract
unwanted attention and unnecessary trouble. That this is a maxim most
of our ministers and bureaucrats abide by is evident from the fact that
almost nothing changes in government offices no matter how many changes
we, the people, try to effect. We vote out governments and give prime
ministers marching orders and still the business of government goes on
much as it has always done-unhurriedly, inefficiently and without dramatic
change. A recent incident made me realise that perhaps we of the Fourth
Estate are partly to blame for this.
Not
long ago in a less salubrious corner of Delhi's fashionable Khan Market
a new store called the Khadi Shop opened. It is a new old shop really,
since there always was a government shop there selling second-rate khadi
goods in the usual half-hearted government manner. Its newness comes from
it being the first government shop that has made a determined effort to
let the fresh breeze of the market blow through its musty interiors. Gone
are the dreary heaps of coarse cloth, the mouldy smells, the badly stitched
kurta pyjamas. In their place are khadi clothes designed by some of our
best known designers who, incidentally, charged the government nothing
for their services. Also available are herbal products in nice containers,
all of which indicates the government has at last realised that there
is a real market for these goods. The shop has reported sales so brisk
that it is hard to keep it adequately supplied but you would not know
this if you read about it in your daily rag. Most reporters who have visited
the shop have reacted not with approval but righteous indignation. "Aren't
we messing up Gandhi's legacy?" is a sample of the sneering headline
that greeted the new shop.
Not one of our famed investigative journalists
has so far bothered to find out whether Gandhi's legacy has not been "messed
up" for many years or whether the shop is not a first, small attempt
to clear up the mess.
Had they bothered they may have discovered that
in the name of Gandhiji, the Khadi Village Industries Commission (KVIC)
has long been used to loot the poor by racketeers who hide behind the
banner of khadi and under the ragged cloak of Gandhism. The Government
discovered this when it asked management consultancy firm Arthur Andersen
to prepare a report on what was wrong with KVIC. The report revealed several
flaws in the system including the fact that massive amounts of taxpayers'
money was being handed out in rebates and subsidies to organisations and
individuals who were not producing a single yard of khadi. Acting on the
report the Government investigated the agencies to which it was shelling
out rebates and cancelled spurious organisations from its list. So, this
year the amount we spend on rebates has come down from Rs 200 crore to
Rs 60 crore.
Interestingly, instead of being applauded, the
Government was reviled in the press for bringing an "MNC" into
Gandhiji's swadeshi path. The same sort of reaction has greeted the Government's
attempts to improve its hopelessly outdated and over-staffed retail outlets.
Even more interesting is the fact that the opposition from the press has
helped the charlatans and the racketeers. The old Congress Gandhians,
you see, have now been replaced by (irony of ironies) RSS Gandhians who
want the rebates, subsidies and shoddy goods to continue for exactly the
same reasons: patronage at taxpayers' expense for supporters and acolytes.
Not the poor.
Meanwhile, there is a huge market not just in
India but abroad for good quality KVIC products since herbal cosmetics
and tonics and environment-friendly cloth is much in demand. We may never
tap it, though, if we continue to prevent the Government from making the
necessary changes.
Khadi is not the only story in which the Fourth
Estate has missed the point. Whenever a ministry or government department
tries to make changes-in the ineffectual PDS or in anti-poverty programmes
that rarely reach the poor-there is more outrage than approval. Why? Because,
for some mysterious reason, we believe we speak for what we so disparagingly
call "the common man". Does the common man shop in Khan Market
or Connaught Place? No, but the reporters who attacked the Khadi Shop
appeared not to know this.
The truth is we speak not for the common man
but for vested interests. We speak for those who have exploited the government
in the name of the poor. If competition from television had not forced
even serious newspapers to replace investigative journalism with gossip
columns we may have already found this out. As things stand we could use
an Arthur Andersen report on the Fourth Estate.
|