|
Letters |
  |
Adding
Feud to Fire |
 |
|

There cannot be any doubt about the clean image
of Maneka Gandhi but the manner in which she was divested
of the culture portfolio surely puts a question mark on the
prime minister ("Gandhi Versus Gandhi", December
3). The timing of Maneka's ouster indicates that A.B. Vajpayee
wanted the main opposition party-the Congress-to return the
favour with help in Parliament over contentious issues like
POTO and the reinduction of George Fernandes as defence minister.
Maneka's decision to cleanse the IGNCA, NMML and other institutions
was laudable and a step in the right direction.
S. Balakrishnan, Jamshedpur
Maneka Gandhi is reputed to be cynical and brazen. Her excessive
inquisitiveness about M.V. Kamath, N.R. Shetty and L.M. Singhvi-all
men of eminent standing-smacks of spite. Her brand of honesty
is no longer considered admirable. In fact, this virtue might
have been a misdirected attempt to play to the gallery. Add
the "hate-Sonia" syndrome and Maneka appears as
an honest lady with bundles of disputation.
Dr Ganapathi Bhat, Bangalore
|
|
While rightly
lauding the US for its singular devotion in reacting to terrorism, your
editorial draws an unfair comparison with India's battle against terrorism
("Lessons of War", December 3). It is wrong to hold the leadership
responsible for the state of affairs because national will is created
not only by the political leader but also by the opposition and the intellectual
community. It comes into force only when we have proper discussions in
our society and the facts are placed before the people. If perverted facts
become the basis of a debate, only wrong conclusions will be arrived at.
It is the duty of the intellectuals to help not only the leadership but
also society by ensuring that its people have proper and complete information.
After all, a misguided nation cannot be led properly.
Ashok Chowgule, President, Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Maharashtra
Print Freedom
Every argument offered for a continued ban on foreign investment in
the print media was unconvincing ("Swadeshi Times", December
3). If foreigners can hold stakes in Indian companies and foreign TV channels
can operate in the domestic market, why should the print media be placed
on a different pedestal? All the excuses advanced by the major players
for status quo in policy clearly expose their fear of losing their profitable
turf. There was similar fear even in case of globalisation and liberalisation
but time bears testimony to the fact that Indian consumers have benefited.
Even in the case of the print media, whenever sanity, impartiality and
wisdom dawn on our policy makers, we readers can hope to be better informed.
For far too long we have been taken for a ride.
S. Madhavan, Mumbai
On the Rocks
It is a shame that priceless archaeological finds are decaying for want
of adequate care or are stolen and clandestinely smuggled out of India
("History on Sale", December 3). Who is to blame for this: our
government that is perpetually engrossed in petty politics, the prevailing
crass materialism that makes a mockery of our glorious heritage, or our
perverted brand of secularism that communalises history? We would do well
to learn from other countries which treat relics of the past as objects
of national pride.
Santosh Kapoor, Noida
A Perfect World
It cannot be denied that Karan Johar is a capable filmmaker who understands
the nuances of filmmaking ("Cry Baby", December 3). But to repeat
the same trite formula of happy families and singing siblings in a utopic
world is becoming too much to digest. About time that he, together with
other members of the young brigade like Sooraj Barjatya, Aditya Chopra
and Sanjay Leela Bhansali, realised that filmmaking is not just about
designer clothes, flashy cars, stupendous sets, opulent jewellery and
a dozen songs. If only Johar had something meaningful to offer on contemporary
and novel issues it would be a welcome departure from the escapist fare.
Vikas Bardia, Delhi
Pantheon Pilferage
I was shocked that government agencies and the Archaeological Survey
of India can be so careless and callous about our ancient assets ("Stolen
Gods", November 26). What concerns me particularly is the havoc that
such acts can wreak. Imagine the communal hatred and tension mischief
makers can whip up by entering into and placing the idols at disputed
sites. Looks as though God alone can save himself.
Akhilesh Kumar Sah, Faizabad
Readers are recommended to make appropriate enquiries before sending
money, incurring expenses or entering into commitments in relation to
any advertisement appearing in this publication. The India Today Group
does not vouch for any claims made by the advertisers of products and
services. The printer, publisher, editor-in-chief and the editor of the
India Today Group publications shall not be held liable for any consequences
in the event of such claims not being honoured by the advertisers.
FOR SUBSCRIPTION ASSISTANCE
CALL AT: DELHI: board numbers: 3352233, Ext. 165/173/179 Toll free
numbers: 1600111155 (Delhi only) Tele/Fax 3352874 Fax 3712998 KOLKATA:
Tel 2821922, 2827726, 2825398 Fax 2825398, 2827254 BANGALORE: Tel 2212448,
2290562, 2218343 Fax 2218335 MUMBAI: Tel 4444423/4/5/6 Fax 4444358 CHENNAI:
Tel 8531605, 8591729, 8532247 Fax 8532178.
WRITE IN: WE CARE, The India Today Group, Post Box No. 141, New Delhi-110001.
e-mail: wecare@intoday.com
|