|
|
|
|
|
DUAL TACTICS: Jaswant cold-shouldered
Sattar in Kathmandu (left); Fernandes inspects a bunker on the Indo-Pak
border
|
|
Islamabad's negative response to the most-wanted
list has India planning tougher diplomatic offensives.
|
That Delhi
is still not assured of Islamabad's commitment to action against terrorism
directed at India was symbolically conveyed by External Affairs Minister
Jaswant Singh at the SAARC summit in Kathmandu. Signalling a tough Indian
stand on terrorism, Jaswant merely shook hands with his Pakistani counterpart
Abdul Sattar when he met him on January 2 and smiled for the cameras.
He did not initiate any formal or informal dialogue despite intense international,
particularly the US, pressure to ease tensions.
India is upset over Pakistan's response-"show us the evidence"-
to the list it submitted of 20 terrorists and criminals most wanted in
India who are believed to have taken refuge in Pakistan. India wants Pakistan
to take action against those named in the "most wanted" list
under the UN Security Council Resolution 1373 that urges all countries
to eradicate the scourge of terrorism. Delhi's effort, however, is not
confined to the list but on making the world aware that Pakistan is part
of the terrorism problem and not the solution. The Atal Bihari Vajpayee
Government is prepared to take stronger diplomatic measures against Pakistan
if it does not take immediate steps to deal with terrorism against India.
The perception is that while General Pervez Musharraf made a strategic
choice to act against terrorist groups targeting America under US pressure,
he is still to come to terms with the extremists operating in Jammu and
Kashmir. And till such time, Delhi will have the options
of withdrawing the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status from Pakistan and
abrogating the Indus Water Treaty. "We should make it clear to Pakistan
that if it can bleed us in Jammu and Kashmir, we have the capability to
starve them," says G. Parthasarathy, former Indian high commissioner
to Pakistan.
|
COVER STORY |
  |
VOICES
OF RESTRAINT |
 |
|
AMERICA
"US is leaning on the Musharraf regime to rein
in the terrorists. President Bush has expressed understanding
for the feelings in India." Colin Powell, Secretary
of State
G-8 COUNTRIES
"We urge Pakistan to take further action against
such groups, to arrest and severely punish their leaders
and to curtail their financing." G-8 statement
EUROPE
"The European Union considers it indispensable
that the strongest measures be taken by Pakistan for
putting an end to the actions of terrorist groups."
EU statement
RUSSIA
"We understand your outrage. Your demands for prohibition
of terrorist groups are justified. There is no good
or bad terrorist." Igor Ivanov, Foreign Minister
BRITAIN
"These violent groups have no place in a modern
society. I urge Musharraf to continue his action against
them with resolve." Jack Straw, Foreign Secretary
UNITED NATIONS
"I condemn the attack on Parliament in the strongest
possible terms. I am grateful for the continued restraint
being shown by India." Kofi Anan, UN Secretary-General
|
|
|
The strategy of deft diplomatic manoeuvres combined with military posturing
against Pakistan has paid some dividends with the international community
now convinced that the locus of terrorism has crossed the Durand Line
from Afghanistan. India's approach since the outrageous attack on Parliament
has been to ensure maximum international pressure on Pakistan to make
it act against terrorist groups on its own and avoid a military conflict
with India. Clarifying what he expected from Pakistan, Vajpayee told the
press before leaving for Kathmandu, "The two crucial elements in
this would be strict curbs on sources of finance and denial of safe havens
for training, arming and operations of terrorists."
While Vajpayee is determined to adopt a strong diplomatic posture, the
Government is signalling that India, as a responsible South Asian power,
has no intentions of initiating military action against Pakistan. Signs
of this were evident in the prime minister's New Year message and the
Government's statement welcoming Pakistani action against the Lashkar-e-Toiba
(LeT) and the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) terrorist groups.
At the same time, the Government is on guard against any repetition
of the Kargil and the Agra fiasco that followed the prime minister's Lahore
bus journey and the Kumarakom musings. The Indian strategy involves a
"measured and calibrated" action on the diplomatic front that
goes hand in hand with determination to repel any Pakistani misadventure
on its borders.
While there has been no dilution of the Indian diplomatic posture, the
military option seems to have temporarily taken a back seat after Pakistan
arrested LeT and JeM leaders and clamped down on their activities. However,
Delhi is not convinced by reports that Musharraf has asked the ISI not
to back jehadi movement in Kashmir. Senior officials say, "Terrorism
is terrorism even if it assumes a different name. Violence is unjustified
whatever be the end game. By simply breaking the Pakistani link from Jammu
and Kashmir, Islamabad thinks that it can fool the international community."
|
|
| OFFENSIVE DEFENCE: BSF
men take position as Pakistani troops open fire in the Jammu sector.
Military build-up on the border has continued despite international
pressure. |
|
"If diplomacy fails, we are left with
the option that the US exercised." G. Fernandes, Indian
Defence Minister
|
While Delhi has given serious thought to the US calls for restraint,
the Vajpayee Government finds it difficult to buy the American line that
Musharraf is a changed man and will deliver on terrorism. Despite the
US operational requirements in Afghanistan, Pakistan is known to have
deployed two infantry divisions from its Peshawar-based 11 Corps and Quetta-based
12 Corps on the Indo-Pakistan border. The Indian military build-up on
the Line of Control (LoC) and the borders, the biggest since the 1971
Indo-Pakistan conflict, is primarily aimed at deterring any Pakistani
aggression.
Delhi's military posture, described as "offensive-defensive"
by Defence Ministry officials, is calibrated to ensure that no Pakistani
misadventure goes unpunished. While the Indian armed forces will not initiate
hostilities, they have been primed to retaliate against Pakistani assaults-from
Poonch-Rajouri sector on the LoC to the Raghubir Singh Pura sector on
the international border.
Given the low Pakistani nuclear threshold, the Indian assessment is
that a conventional conflict has every chance of going nuclear. However,
this does not prevent the Indian side from taking military action against
any infiltration from across the borders.
India's long-term strategy is to ensure that terrorism is rooted out
from the subcontinent and to make the political establishment in Pakistan
realise that India will not compromise on the Jammu and Kashmir issue.
While Vajpayee has indicated that India was ready to walk "more than
half the distance" to sort out all outstanding bilateral issues-including
Kashmir-with Pakistan, the Indian Government has also shown willingness
to open new diplomatic fronts to convey its seriousness on the terrorism
issue.
But with Islamabad dilly-dallying even on the "most wanted"
list, at best a sideshow in the war against terror, the Vajpayee Government
may be forced to look beyond diplomacy. As Defence Minister George Fernandes
warns, "If they should fail, then we are left with the only option
that the US exercised to deal with terrorism." Everyone knows what
that means.
|