| |
Jan 2002
|
Jan 2001
|
| The temple to be built immediately |
43
|
20
|
| The courts to resolve the matter |
20
|
19
|
| The Government to initiate dialogue |
16
|
37
|
| The Babri Masjid to be rebuilt |
05
|
5
|
| Maintain the status quo |
04
|
8
|
|
All figures in per cent. Rest:
don't know/can't say.
|
Since the
destruction of the Babri Masjid on December 6, 1992, the Ayodhya dispute
has popped in and out of the political agenda. Since the Kumbha Mela Dharma
Sansad last year, the VHP has revived the issue but without the endorsement
of any political party. This has not prevented a hardening of stands.
In an India Today-MARG opinion poll of August 1993, 51 per cent wanted
a Ram mandir on the disputed site. This was despite a 53 per cent disapproval
of the demolition in a January 1993 poll. Subsequently, a negotiated approach
was preferred. Now, ominously, the wheel has turned a full circle.
METHODOLOGY
The Mood of the Nation poll covered 17,522 eligible voters spread across
16 states and 95 Lok Sabha constituencies. The sample was representative
of urban and rural areas, men and women, and all age and social groups.
Assembly constituencies were sampled on the stratified systemic random
sampling method. House-to-house and face-to-face interviews were conducted
using the right hand rule of field movement. All analysis has been done
as BJP+ allies, Congress+ allies and Others (which includes the Left Front).
To maintain continuity, the 1999 alignments were taken. The fieldwork,
overseen by ORG-MARG Research Director Vivek Kumar, was done between January
10 and 19.
If Pakistan doesn't cooperate with India's demand
to take action against terrorists operating from its soil, India should
...
| Attack POK/Pakistan |
37
|
| Exercise restraint, initiate talks with Pakistan |
19
|
| Launch a diplomatic offensive, take it to the UN |
16
|
| Request the US to intervene |
08
|
| Do nothing |
04
|
|
All figures in per cent. Rest:
don't know/can't say.
|
If India goes to war with Pakistan, its objective
should be...
| Limited strikes to destroy terrorist camps |
32
|
| All out war against Pakistan |
21
|
| Recover Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir |
19
|
| No war |
14
|
|
All figures in per cent. Rest:
don't know/can't say.
|
Do you support India joining the US-led war
against terrorism?
|
Support 65
|
Oppose 13
|
|
All figures in per cent. Rest:
don't know/can't say.
|
If there is one factor triggering a growing mood of Hindu militancy,
it is terrorism. In the August 2001 Mood of the Nation poll, 47 per cent
were deeply sceptical of any peace between India and Pakistan. At the
same time, 47 per cent supported Vajpayee's Agra initiative, despite its
failure. Now, patience seems to have run out. Islamism seems to have been
identified as the enemy and support for the US-led war against terrorism
is unequivocal. If there is war against Pakistan, 40 per cent want to
go the whole hog. The support for a military solution is higher among
men, the young, the better educated and BJP voters. Hawkishness is also
more marked in northern and western India, suggesting an underlying Hindu
backlash.
Do you support POTO, which is a harsh law to
deal with terrorists?
|
Support 57
|
Oppose 11
|
|
All figures in per cent. Rest:
don't know/can't say.
|
Which party is the best for solving India's
problems?
|
Cong 31
|
BJP 32
|
| Aug 2001 |
Jan 2001
|
Aug 2001
|
Jan 2001 |
| 33 |
34
|
28
|
|
31
|
|
All figures in per cent. Rest: don't know/can't
say.
|
This question tries to identify political affinity, as opposed to voting
intentions. The findings indicate that for the first time the BJP has
overtaken the Congress in its positioning as a party of government. This
suggests a significant shift in what constitutes the political consensus
of the day. The agenda seems to have veered sharply to the right. This
will have a bearing on official policy. The survey also suggests the BJP
has maintained its social profile-an urban tilt with most support among
the 18-24 age group, the better educated and the intermediate and upper
caste Hindus. The Congress has failed to penetrate the growing middle
classes and is confined to the poor and minorities.
|