On Slippery Ground
General Pervez Musharraf's speech was a step forward in his drive against
terrorism ("Can Pakistan Change?", January 21). But though it
may have won him accolades and America's goodwill, it will not dilute
the threat posed to his regime by the extremists and hawks. By sounding
the bugle in the war against Islamic terrorism and religious fundamentalism,
he has become a pariah of sorts among his own countrymen. Musharraf is
treading on a precarious path and needs to consolidate his hold over his
country-for his own good as well as for reaching a lasting solution to
the Kashmir issue.
Jinu Mathew, on e-mail
In quality management, the Alligator Allegory is a theory that illustrates
the difference between control and improvement: when the reptiles are
eliminated before they approach the pool, it denotes "control"
of the problem-a tactical move-whereas when the nearby hatchery is closed,
it is "improvement"-a strategic solution. Similarly, what the
Musharraf doctrine promises is improvement-a ray of hope. Control-apprehending
terrorists and eliminating them-perhaps still is our duty.
F.M. Soonawalla, Lucknow
Musharraf says that the issue of Kashmir has to be resolved according
to the wishes of the Kashmiri people, but with so many Kashmiri Pandits
having taken refuge in different parts of India, how can a referendum
represent the true will of the Kashmiri people?
Abhishek Kaul, Delhi
| Letters
|
  |
Battle
Won, War None |
 |
|
Having been a part of the 1965 and 1971
wars with Pakistan, I firmly believe that there is no
possibility of another war at this juncture ("Raising
the Stakes", January 7). It suits Pakistan that
without losing a single soldier, its proxy war in Kashmir
kills Indian troops. Besides, having attacked first-and
lost-in the previous wars, it will not dare to be the
aggressor, and India is so strongly under Gandhian influence
that it will not attack first either. Moreover, Pakistan
knows that should there be a war, whatever India gains
by blood and grit would be returned to Pakistan. So
why have a war?
Brigadier (retd) T. Kartikeyan, on
e-mail
The war against terrorism would be effective only
if we address the issue in a comprehensive manner. By
militarily flushing out the terrorists-or the nation
patronising them-we cannot eliminate the ideology on
which they operate. Terrorism demands a holistic socio-economic
and political solution.
Ashish S. Thakare, on e-mail
|
|
|
Leave the Kids Alone
Your report on Indian youth cricket highlighted the appalling mismanagement
of Indian cricket ("Young, Promising, Undone", January 28).
While Jagmohan Dalmiya and the BCCI squabble about television rights and
sponsorship deals and play political games at the international level,
the future of Indian cricket is left in the hands of a soulless gang of
money-grabbing speculators who deserve to be publicly whipped. Young cricketers
are India's future and their importance to the emotional health of the
country cannot be overstated.
Martin Da Costa, Mumbai
Junior cricket is now on a wet wicket and is unfortunately receiving
less importance these days. The team to New Zealand did not get the necessary
encouragement. It makes for glaring contrast with the hype and hoopla
created by the BCCI and the press when the senior team travels overseas
despite its poor track record of failing to win a single series away from
Asia for the past 16 years. It is time to encourage our youngsters or
else the trophy cupboard will be empty after the 2003 World Cup.
C.K. Subramaniam, on e-mail
Readers are recommended to make appropriate enquiries before sending
money, incurring expenses or entering into commitments in relation to
any advertisement appearing in this publication. The India Today Group
does not vouch for any claims made by the advertisers of products and
services. The printer, publisher, editor-in-chief and the editor of the
India Today Group publications shall not be held liable for any consequences
in the event of such claims not being honoured by the advertisers.
|