|
Every book
awaits its big moment. Ahmed Rashid's Taliban began life as a well-researched
study on one of the most obscure and forbidding corners of the world-on
a par with, say, Eritrea, Western Sahara and Myanmar-and was catapulted
into the top of The New York Times bestsellers list by the events of September
11. Now, with the spectre of Islamism dominating the global agenda, this
intrepid Pakistani journalist has returned with a study of an equally
forbidding regime.
|
|
JIHAD: THE RISE OF MILITANT ISLAM IN CENTRAL ASIA
By Ahmed Rashid
Yale University Press
Price: $24
Pages: 281 |
In the early 20th century, Central Asia captivated Lord Curzon and a
handful of crotchety old Russophobes in London's clubland. Two years ago,
a mainstream publisher would think many times before putting his money
on a book about countries that every diplomat regarded as good places
to avoid. Post September 11, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan
and Tajikistan have muscled their way back to the geopolitical centre
as the new growth areas of jehad. And, like with Taliban, Rashid is riding
the crest of the rediscovery.
It is a fascinating story Rashid has told with lucidity, richness of
detail and fullness of understanding. The former Soviet republics were
at the receiving end of the worst form of Stalinist excesses. Between
their incorporation into the Soviet Union and their re-emergence as independent
republics, they experienced the near-total destruction of a traditional
way of life, ethnic engineering, cartographic vandalism and the outlawing
of faith. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the long-suppressed
energies began finding political expression despite the persistence of
old-style Stalinist regimes-Turkmenistan has a president who is a living
reincarnation of Albania's Enver Hoxha. With the entry into the market
economy proving extremely troubled-notwithstanding the surfeit of natural
resources-popular disaffection found an easy outlet in Islamic revivalism.
From the rediscovery of religion to the emergence of a jehadi opposition
was an instinctive step.
 |
| Uzbekis offer prayers at a Tashkent mosque |
At the centre of the turmoil is Uzbekistan where President Islam Karimov
has been waging a difficult war against the Wahabist Hizb-ut-Tahrir (HuT)
and the pro-Taliban Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU). Led by the charismatic
Juma Namangani-a Mullah Omar-like figure who was killed in Mazar-e-Sharif
last year-and Tohir Yuldeshev, the IMU used the safe haven of Taliban
Afghanistan to harass the Karimov regime and preach jehad. And like other
jehadi movements, the IMU has used the network of illegal madarsas inspired
by the Deobandi ideology, newly created mosques, profits from drug trade,
extortion and financial aid from Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to sustain
itself.
After the fall of the Taliban and the deaths of many Central Asian jehadis
in the battles for Kunduz and Mazar-e-Sharif, the immediate jehadi threat
has receded. However, it will take the inevitable diversion of international
attention before the problem resurfaces. Rashid believes that the totalitarianism
of the Central Asian rulers and their record of brutal incompetence has
made jehad attractive. He argues for a greater degree of power sharing
between the ex-communists and the moderate Islamists, as has happened
in Tajikistan. He presses his case by suggesting an extension of the scope
of jehad-from the lesser jehad of political activism to the greater jehad
of moral discipline and finding God within.
It sounds appealing. But the problem is that the "greater"
jehad has invariably been subsumed by the "lesser" one. Positing
any jehad as a humane politico-theological solution for the Islamic world
is about as ridiculous as suggesting that the Final Solution is actually
something as innocuous as the answer to an algebraic riddle. Afghanistan
has shown that the alternative to jehad isn't liberal angst but superior
might coupled with choking supply lines. Liberal democracy in the region
is a good idea that must wait another age.

|