Everyone who
is interested in India's development experience in the past half-century
ought to read this book. This is not only because of the credentials of
the author, a brilliant economist and alert thinker, but also because of
his position at the helm of India's economic policymaking machinery for
such a long time. I cannot hope to summarise the contents of this book here.
Instead, I shall offer some comments on it in the hope of inducing I.G.
Patel to write a sequel to the present volume.
 |
GLIMPSES OF INDIAN ECONOMIC
POLICY
By I.G. Patel
Oxford
Price: Rs 395
Pages: 215
n by Mrinal Datta-Chaudhuri
I.G. Patel's snapshots on the politics behind policymaking |
In the first chapter, he gives us a glimpse of his own intellectual development.
He writes about the influence of the various leaders of India's independence
movement. He felt an affinity with the ideas of the social democrats within
the movement. Incidentally, I do not think that the similarity he draws
between the economic ideas of Mahatma Gandhi and those of European Christian
socialists is fair to either side.
The author also refers extensively to the state of professional knowledge
of development economics in those days. Given the experience of the previous
half-century, few economists then expected international trade to emerge
as an engine of growth. The need for raising the rate of capital accumulation
with domestic savings and foreign aid in order to pursue industrial progress
on a broad front was then the dominant theme of development economics.
For today's readers, what is interesting are Patel's thoughtful comments
on the policy initiatives of that period in the light of our knowledge
today.
However, what the readers of this book will read with utmost interest
are Patel's views on the political dimensions of policymaking in India.
For example, at the time of the nationalisation of banks, Indira Gandhi
bluntly told him that it was a "political decision", with the
clear message that no arguments would be entertained. Patel also writes
about the events leading to the MRTP Act. He explains clearly why it could
not possibly address the problems of monopolies and restrictive practices
in Indian industries. He is too good an economist not to have realised
that these measures would inevitably restrict the pace of industrial growth.
His readers will want to know who were the people behind the initiative
and what was the source of their political strength.
 |
| THE PATHFINDER:
Patel |
There is a growing feeling among young economists in India today that
governments here never hired well-known economists for getting sound professional
advice. They were essentially hired to lend a measure of respectability
to whatever the political bosses did in their efforts at power-grabbing
and rent-seeking. There is also a feeling that economic development has
never been high on the agenda of different groups participating in India's
competitive politics: economics was useful in so far as it could supply
attractive slogans. Patel is in a unique position to evaluate these conjectures.
I was somewhat puzzled by his rather bland reporting of the talk between
former prime minister Morarji Desai and Lee Kwan Yew of Singapore. Of
course, in the field of economic development, Singapore is a success story.
But Lee raised misleading economic slogans to curb civil liberties and
trade union activities in order to legitimise the monolithic power of
his Peoples' Action Party. In this respect he was no different from Indira
Gandhi.
As a social democrat, Patel knows that the institutions of democracy
need not constitute a barrier to economic development as numerous studies
have shown. I believe the prospects of economic development in India will
brighten only when our career politicians feel the pressure of effective
demand for economic development from the voters. Therefore, the true social
value of the expertise and the experiences of people like Patel-there
are not many in that category-will be realised when these assets are put
to use in educating our citizenry on the pathologies of our political
economy. Now, Dr Patel, will you please write a companion to this book.
|