The NewspaperToday  |  HOME      

  IN THIS ISSUE
SEE COVER IMAGE

COVER STORY


Trial By Fire
Religious Rage

 
OTHER STORIES


Moments of Glory
Three Losers
Royal Challenge
The Rewind Man
Queen Victor
Low Calorie Budget
Riding Roughshod
Calling a Truce
Soul Journal
Evil Impulse
Saving Zain
Something Fishy
Green Revolution
Britney Brigade
Return of Oomph

 
COLUMNS


Fifth Column: Tavleen Singh
Kautilya: Jairam Ramesh

 
METRO TODAY


Diary of Events

 


As the Hashmis get the nod to create a designer baby, prospects for their ill Zain look up.

NRI DIARY

Art Under the Hammer
Money Spinner
India Calling

 

 
WEB EXCLUSIVES

Ghazal singers Roopkumar and Sonali Rathod are out with a new album: Sunn Zara. A marked departure from their earlier renditions, the album features a variety of melody genres. India Today's S. Sahaya Ranjit met the duo for an exclusive interview.
Excerpts:
 
INDIA TODAY CONCLAVE

The Conclave concludes on a high note. Al Gore, Stanley Fischer and other world leaders listen and our heard. Catch up on the highlights.
Take me to Conclave now
 
CARE TODAY
 
INDIA TODAY HINDI
 
 
 CURRENT ISSUE MARCH 11, 2002  

EDITORIAL

A Nation Challenged
India cannot afford a riot in the name of Ayodhya, though someone wants it

That inferno of a train in Godhra in Gujarat magnified a terrifying truth: men driven by hate are out there to set the Indian civil society on fire. As the religious identity of certain passengers and their station of embarkation-Ayodhya-were a provocation for the savage act that killed more than 50 people, Godhra definitely had an agenda-a political, communal agenda. The riot that spread across the streets of Gujarat had its authorship in the perpetrators of Godhra. No point overlooking this fact. The Vishwa Hindu Parishad, the most impulsive member of the Sangh Parivar and never known for passive resistance, reacted to Godhra in its own style: a violent bandh. And at this moment, a black-and-white, qualitative distinction between the crime and the consequence is a futile exercise. The question is: does India deserve this? Or, can India afford another communal riot? No, certainly not. A riot with Ayodhya as the mobilising cry is all the more out of place, for the political distance between Ayodhya 1992 and Ayodhya 2002 is too vast to be reduced by the lonely rage of the VHP. Both the text and the context have changed.

The text is no longer the unleashed Hindu rage. The VHP has made Ayodhya almost a sectarian cause by electing itself as the sole champion of the historical Hindu grief. Today Ayodhya is steeped in legal and political uncertainties, begging for a resolution, not the kind the VHP wants to achieve. And the context: the spirit of the times is a repudiation of any form of religious violence, and India, as victim and defender, is in no position to play host to bloodletting religious rage. Think of it: a politically demoralised government ( courtesy Uttar Pradesh and other election humiliations) and a state on communal fire. Political responsibility and communal reason demand that the protagonists of Godhra and the riot born out of it should be denied the freedom to play out their divisive script. To some extent risking its own core ideological identity, the Vajpayee Government has made it unpleasantly clear to the VHP: on Ayodhya the Centre cannot deviate from its constitutional obligations. A mandir in the backdrop of a riot-no matter who is its true author-is not a vishwa Hindu triumph. It can only be a national tragedy-and a blazing triumph for those barbarians who set the train in Godhra on fire. India can't let it happen.

Index
[an error occurred while processing this directive]