|
This
is the land that has seen the confluence of Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism,
Zoroastrianism and Islam for centuries. This is the land where Hindu kings
built mosques and where Muslims still follow many Hindu traditions. This
is the land of the author of the haunting Vaishnava Janato ... and of
that inspiring apostle of ahimsa and tireless crusader for communal harmony
whom we call Father of the Nation.
This is also the land of boundless entrepreneurial energy, a state that
is among India's most urbanised and industrialised. This is India's fourth
richest state, which clocked Chinese-style economic growth rates in the
1990s. Yet something is very profoundly disturbing about Gujarat. The
communalisation of Gujarati society pre-dates the BJP's rise as a political
force in 1990. In the 1980s, even somebody as distinguished as Ghulam
Sheikh, the painter who was even married to a Hindu, could not obtain
a professorial appointment in Vadodara's MS University in spite of its
vice-chancellor Bhikhu Parikh championing his case. But the 1990s have
been worse. Pravin Togadia, educated and a cancer surgeon to boot but
a Hindu version of Mullah Omar, represents a widely prevalent obscurantist
mindset as does the suave and slick Narenda Modi, now exposed as the cheerleader
of genocidal goons. How do you explain this Gujarati cocktail of heady
economic growth and sharp social retrogression?
Could
it be due to the burdens of history? After all the historic Somnath temple
ravaged by Mahmud Ghazni almost a thousand years ago and reconstructed
in 1950 is located in the state. M.A. Jinnah himself hailed from Gujarat.
A number of the erstwhile princely states, mini-states and feudatories
in the region that eventually became Gujarat had to be forced into the
Indian Union by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Junagadh being a prime example.
Second, have the traumatic September 1969 Ahmedabad riots grievously
damaged the Gujarati psyche, both Hindu and Muslim? Ahmedabad had witnessed
communal clashes earlier in 1941 and 1946 but 1969 was a bloodbath, taking
place ironically in the birth centenary year of Sabarmati's saint. Over
600 lives were lost in the holocaust spread over four to five days. Gujarat's
subsequent history has been one of religious clashes that have not spared
even cities with a history of peace like Surat.
Third, has Muslim disenchantment and frustration, exploited by mischief-makers
from outside, fuelled Hindu revivalism? Nine per cent of Gujarat's population
is Muslim. Yet, in a Vidhan Sabha of 182, there are but four Muslim MLAs.
Even at the peak of social engineering-the kham alliance between Kshatriyas,
Harijans, Adivasis and Muslims which gave the Congress huge majorities
in 1980 and 1985-the number of Muslim MLAs was seven. In states like Kerala,
Karnataka, West Bengal and even Uttar Pradesh, Muslim representation in
politics is substantial and not as marginal as it is in Gujarat.
Fourth, what social impact has the decline in the textile industry and
the "casualisation" of the labour force had? In Ahmedabad alone,
about one lakh workers, 20,000 of them Muslims, have been retrenched in
the past two decades. A large number work in the vastly lower wage informal
sector, other avenues of employment being closed to them. This is a readymade
pool of the disaffected and the frustrated. The underworld has been able
to spread its tentacles as well because of the counterproductive prohibition
policy that is in force.
Fifth, how has the decline of civic institutions, of which Gujarat has
a rich tradition, impacted on communal harmony? This is a thesis that
has been analysed in scholarly detail in a very recent book, Ashutosh
Varshney's Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life. The noted Indian-American academic
at the University of Michigan looks at three pairs of cities, Calicut
and Aligarh, Hyderabad and Lucknow and Ahmedabad and Surat to understand
communal violence and the wellsprings of communal harmony. His conclusion:
the decline of the Congress as a civic force and of trade unions and labour
movements in Ahmedabad specially has adversely affected communal amity.
Finally, could there be something in the nature of Gujarati urban capitalism
in the 1970s and thereafter that engenders social chaos? Economic growth
has created sharp regional disparities within the state and its human
development indicators like infant mortality do not do it proud. Has a
new, rugged class, different from the high-minded Sarabhais and the Lalbhais,
taken over, a class that eminent journalist-academic Harish Khare has
called "lumpen capitalists"? Along these lines, is religious
fervour at home, both Hindu and Muslim, also being fuelled by long-distance
nationalism, by the globalisation of the Gujarati middle class-at least
one-third of the Indians in the UK and US have Gujarati origins.
At this benumbing moment of darkness and despair, of shock and shame,
this Indian's immediate catharsis can only take the form of such troubling
questions.
(The author is with the Congress party. These are
his personal views)
|