 |
|
"SEZs will be the laboratory for the
market economy and labour reforms."
Murasoli Maran, Union Commerce Minister
|
Murasoli
Maran wants to rewind so that India can fast forward. The commerce minister's
target of capturing 1 per cent of world exports by 2007 will only restore
India to the position it held in the 1950s. In 1950-51, India's exports
were a mere $1.36 billion but comprised nearly 2 per cent of global exports.
That's when the Indian economy shut its doors and shunned trade, even
as many other economies opened up and embraced globalisation. Result:
By 2000-1 India's exports had climbed up to $44.4 billion, but formed
a mere 0.65 per cent share of global exports. World trade had grown much
faster than India's exports.
If Maran's target, set out in the new Export-Import (Exim) Policy, is
to be met, India will have to double its exports in five years to $80
billion by 2007. A Herculean effort considering that export growth in
the first 10 months of 2001-2 has been an abysmal 0.3 per cent. "We
aren't aiming for the moon. But it isn't an easy goal to achieve either.
We have to work hard," admits Maran.
His first task is to flog the 1.5 lakh exporters in India. Points out
trade expert Bibek Debroy: "India has too many exporters and too
little exports." That was a natural consequence of big Indian companies
being focused almost solely on a domestic market that was protected and
more lucrative than markets abroad. The government compounded its fatalistic
approach to exports by reserving most traditional exports for production
in the small-scale sector.
That's the root cause of another big hurdle to attaining Maran's goal:
most Indian exports are low value, low technology and compete on price,
not quality. Despite having 16 per cent share of the world gems and jewellery
market, there are no Indian jewellery brands in the world market. Garment
exports are caught in the same muddle. Small producers, unable to make
big investments in marketing and brand building, are stuck in low-margin
exports.
But nothing could undo Maran's plans as much as the complicated export
procedures and inefficient infrastructure. Transaction cost of exports
from India is estimated to be up to 21 per cent of the export price. Mandatory
bribery at different levels of customs and ports accounts for up to 8
per cent of the export price. Ramu Deora, former president of the Federation
of Indian Export Organisations (fieo) and an exporter of bulk drugs, says
he can send a consignment from his Hamburg warehouse to anywhere in the
world in less than 15 minutes, sitting in India. But it takes three days
to move an export consignment from India.
|
THE 0.6% CURSE AND HOW MARAN HOPES TO BREAK
IT
|
 |
|
...BUT MARAN IS HOPING TO TURN THE TIDE BY...
# Creating SEZs to trim high cost of infrastructure
# Identifying 25 countries and 220 products
for focused export promotion
# Targeting a yearly growth of 11.9%
till 2007 to reach annual exports of $80.48 billion
# That will make India's exports 1%
of the world's
... BUT CRITICS ARE SCEPTICAL OF MARAN'S SUCCESS
BECAUSE ...
# Attempts to promote exports through SEZs
didn't work in 30 years
# SEZs won't succeed without states'
support
# US and Europe are likely to grow slower
in the next five years
# Breakthrough will come only when economy
gets global scales and skills
|
To be fair, much of the complication in the Exim Policy stems from the
complicated tax laws. Exports all over the world are exempt from indirect
taxes. Governments reimburse the taxes paid by exporters. Such paybacks
are easier under simple tax laws where identifying the tax paid is easy.
Not under India's complicated web of Central, state and local taxes. That
explains a plethora of confusing duty drawback certificates, exemptions
and licences in the Exim Policy. "Most people would take days to
understand procedures and provisions of the Indian Exim policy,"
quips Vardhaman Group Chairman S.P. Oswal.
Procedural wrangles like quotas on imports and exports have almost gone.
And that has helped. India's share in global yarn trade zoomed from 2
per cent in the late 1980s to 20 per cent in 2001, largely due to the
removal of export quotas. Licensing procedures are computerised and traders
applying for licence online get approval within hours.
Taking a leaf out of the Chinese experience, Maran proposes to build
13 Special Economic Zones (SEZs) with world-class infrastructure, easier
financing, leaner labour laws and a host of tax benefits. Sceptics doubt
the success of SEZs for two reasons. Past attempts at promoting free-trade
zones have met with middling success, largely because of a lack of support
from state governments. Moreover, since the philosophy of economic reforms
is to make the entire economy competitive, why build SEZs?
Maran admits that the cooperation of states will be critical for SEZs
but is sure that will be forthcoming. He claims Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh
and West Bengal are already committed to the conditions for setting up
SEZs. "SEZs will be the magnet to attract foreign investment and
will be laboratories of market economy and labour reforms," he says.
As an added thrust, the ministry has also chalked out a focused, five-year
strategy to promote exports of 220 products in 25 markets. That's about
as much as the Commerce Ministry can do to promote exports, because the
three main modern day drivers of exports-global demand, currency value
and customs duties-are out of Maran's control.
But as Shashank Bhide, chief economist, NCAER, points out, the product
and market strategies are required till such time the economy isn't competitive.
"The real breakthrough in exports will come only when the domestic
industry and agriculture are globally competitive," he says. If that
is so, then the most potent factor for export promotion is customs duty.
Lower the duty, lesser the protection, and lesser the procedures, more
competitive the industry and exports. That's back to the 1950s.
|