 |
|
|
|
CAPITALIST HAVEN: Pudong (above) is
home to more than half the Fortune 500; consumerism is Red China's
new refrain
|
Birds, those
feathered messengers of hope, are significant by their absence in China.
In the 1960s, the Chinese government considered them a threat to crops
and ordered their extermination. By 1990, there was just one bird species,
the sparrow, extant in all China. Circa 2002, the Chinese do not really
need birds; there are enough symbols of hope to go around.
Hope stares back at you from glass and chrome highrises that abound
in urban China-the east coast mainly, but signs of urban renewal are evident
even in smaller cities like Datong. A construction boom has accompanied
the 22-year-old Chinese experiment with market reforms. "The Chinese
are big on replacing old buildings with bigger ones," says Rakesh
Sharma, the chief representative of the State Bank of India in Shanghai,
the city with an almost-Stalinist frailty for buildings that nudge the
clouds.
 |
|
BARE NECESSITIES? Not quite, the Chinese want
houses and cars, not democracy
|
It is visible urban renewal such as this that belies recent reports that
the Chinese economy is not growing by the 7 per cent-plus the Government
claims. "It is hard to say the economy isn't growing when you look
at what's happening on the ground," says Laurence Brahm, chief executive
of Naga Group, a Beijing-based consulting firm. And it is visible urban
renewal, among other things, that sets apart China from India. Even the
pockets of urban advancement in India-Gurgaon in Delhi, Whitefield in
Bangalore, and the Bandra-Kurla complex in Mumbai-pale into insignificance
against statistics from beyond the wall. A million square feet commercial
complex, Asia's largest, in Beijing's arterial Chang An avenue. Over 20,000
highrises that have mushroomed in Shanghai in the past decade, a number
that remains impressive even after it is discounted for Chinese overstatement.
|
|
| Reformer Zhu is the Chinese people's great hope
for the economy. |
|

|
| By 2001, the Chinese were saving $790 trillion. |
That gilt-edged bubble of a city, Shanghai, even boasts a mini-city of
hope. This is Pudong, where hope soars as high as the world's third tallest
television tower, or its highest hotel, the Grand Hyatt, which occupies
the top 38 floors of an 88-storey, 370-m-tall building. Nothing about
Pudong is small: it occupies an area of 522 sq km, is home to two million
people and has attracted over $40 billion (Rs 1,95,000 crore) in foreign
direct investment (FDI) since its creation in the early 1990s. Pudong
is probably bigger than business warrants, and it certainly does not require
the new international airport it now has, but the Shanghainese are building
for the future, not the present.
Hope cries out to you, from black-topped expressways, 25,000 km of which
have come up since 1998. This has contributed to China's 1.87 trillion
yuan (Rs 11,03,821 crore) debt. Only, the Chinese have a different way
of looking at that. "I will leave behind the next government 2.5
trillion yuan (Rs 14,75,696 crore) of excellent assets which will generate
significant economic and social benefits," said Premier Zhu Rongji
at the ninth National People's Congress held at Beijing in March 2002.
Expressways, new power plants and 24x7 ports have brought in FDI-$48
billion in 2001-but they have also contributed to a fiscal deficit estimated
to touch 309.8 billion yuan (Rs 1,82,868 crore) this year. India's fiscal
deficit in 2001-2 was Rs 1,35,524 crore, but the country managed to attract
a mere $2.1 billion in FDI.
If the Government isn't worried, it is because the domestic economy
is strong and the Chinese save 700-800 billion yuan every year; by 2001-end
gross savings totalled a staggering 6,500 trillion yuan (Rs 3,83,68,11,009
crore). A country that saves as much must believe in the concept of tomorrow.
Hope grins back at you, sometimes toothlessly, at Beijing's sprawling
flower and birds market. People over the age of 65 account for close to
7 per cent of China's population. Most live with their children, on government
pension and try and kill time by raising flowers or birds.
The single-child norm is coming back to haunt the Chinese: rising life
expectancy means a couple in their mid-30s would have to support two sets
of parents, all surviving ancestors, and one child. India has a familial
safety net; China has none. And the absence of a social safety net could
prevent people from spending, or eat into savings, or both. All these
would have disastrous consequences. The Chinese are aggressively building
a social safety net to pre-empt this: employees pay 53 per cent of the
cost of an employee to the government against social security.
Hope drives you around in Shanghai, where former steel workers have been
rehabilitated as cabbies in a government-owned company. "We retrain
workers in state-owned enterprises (SOE) for employment in the tertiary
sector," says Liu Jin Ping, Shanghai's vice-chairman, Foreign Economic
Relations and Trade Commission. Bao Steel, where some of the cabbies work,
is now a successful case study in SOE-restructuring. With 150 million
people employed in SOEs, the services sector is the great white hope of
the Chinese.
How big a hope becomes evident in Beijing's shopping district Wangfujing,
where retail outlets-some, Starbucks, Valentino, BMW, are straight out
of the First World-employ young salespeople, mostly women, from rural
China. China will need to create between 2.3 and 2.7 million jobs each
year and every little bit helps.
Whether it is Wangfujing in Beijing or Shanghai's Nanjing Street (it
caters to a million visitors a day), the young are everywhere. As is an
element of sleaze. Young girls offer to take you to see Chinese art, an
altogether Oriental take on "Do you want to come up and see my etchings?"
Respectable-looking men in suits extend an invitation to "lady-bars".
And in Shanghai, an endless display of taxi-girls throngs the Bund at
night, each suggesting you hop on for a ride.
There's another sound on the streets, though. It isn't the silent swish
of American- and German-made cars barrelling down expressways (for the
record, the VW Passat and the Audi A6, both in black, are today's favourites).
Nor is it the noise generated by close to 160 million Chinese, not the
quietest of people, speaking all at once, into cellular handsets.
This is the clatter of commerce, the aural accompaniment to people eating
out, shopping for the Chinese New Year, buying cars and houses, saving
for the future, and creating wealth. From politicos to consultants, most
Chinese explain this by paraphrasing Deng Xiaoping's remark about allowing
some people to get rich first.
Inherent in that approval of Mammon worship is the belief that the protests
at Tiananmen Square were as much a cry for a market economy as for democracy.
By getting people to focus on economic advancement, goes the theory, the
government managed to push democracy down the average Chinese's priority-list.
English could change that. China is filled with English teachers from
the UK, Canada, the US and Australia-the countries classified by the Chinese
as "native English speaking". There are retired teachers from
Birmingham, students who have taken a year off from college in the American
West Coast and mid-career pros from Australia. English and the Internet-the
Government says there is no censorship, but it is impossible to access
CNN.com directly-could bring in notions of free will and self-determination.
China's future, then, depends on two things: its ability to keep the
economy ticking, and the success of the asset management companies it
has created in cleaning up the estimated 3.6-4.2 trillion yuan (Rs 21,25,003-
24,79,170 crore) bad loans-half the country's GDP-in its financial sector.
That, coupled with the Government's recent call to businesses to "Go
West" to the underdeveloped parts of the country, will ensure that
the benefits of the market economy percolate to the poorest. If that doesn't
happen then social unrest, such as recent workers' strikes in the north-east,
could become endemic and the Middle Kingdom could face its moment of reckoning.
Could that happen? Maybe, maybe not, but there are eight species of birds
in China today.
|