|
There are
leaders who find politically uncertain times the most convenient to search
for their conscience. Ram Vilas Paswan is one such. Union coal minister
till last week, Paswan pulled out of the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Cabinet,
and his latest party offering, the Lok Janshakti, out of the ruling National
Democratic Alliance (NDA), hours before the Lok Sabha debate on April
30. The Opposition-sponsored motion sought to censure the Government on
the continuing violence in Gujarat.
 |
| VOTE BAIT: The Government has survived but
its image has taken a beating |
As the discussion began, Minister of State for External Affairs Omar
Abdullah, of the National Conference (NC), also announced his decision
to quit. With the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) having already declared its
intention not to participate in the voting, the Congress-led Opposition
was anticipating an April 1999-type closing that saw the then Vajpayee
government being thrown out by a solitary vote.
 |
| GOLDEN HOUR: The Congress has gained from the
BJP allies' trial by fire in the debate |
Far from being a close call, the voting at the end of a 16-hour, often
acrimonious debate showed that despite the cracks in the coalition the
Government was safe. The Opposition had pinned its hopes too high. The
Government garnered 281 votes, the Opposition merely 194. "The Vajpayee
Government may have won, but the nation is the ultimate loser," fumed
RJD leader Laloo Prasad Yadav, assuming the uncharacteristic role of democracy's
latest torchbearer. Rural Development Minister M. Venkaiah Naidu showed
no trace of emotion when he said, "Only numbers count in democracy,
not sentiments."
| THE
OPPOSITION |
  |
Profits
of Loss |
 |
|
For the first time in four years, there was unanimity
across
party lines
Even though the opposition failed to carry it through,
its finest hour in the 13th Lok Sabha was the censure motion
on the Gujarat situation. For it divided the ruling NDA, while
uniting the fractured Opposition. Though there was no accretion
in the Opposition numbers, the motion provided it much psychological
comfort.
The motion under Rule 184, which entails voting, put to
test the NDA constituents' commitment to secularism. It took
a toll on the Government, with the cohesiveness of the coalition
eroded. If one minor constituent copped out of the alliance,
another abstained, a third nearly suffered a split and the
regional bulwark, the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), that was supporting
the Government from outside staged a walkout. "The Opposition
succeeded in putting us through agnipariksha," admitted
Janata Dal (United) Parliamentary Party leader Devendra Prasad
Yadav, who defied the party directive to vote against the
motion.
The Congress attack on the Government was spearheaded by
Sonia Gandhi. Besides an impressive intervention, she was
frequently seen egging on her party colleagues when the House
was engulfed in chaos. Now, party leaders feel the Congress
stands to gain from this trial by fire of the BJP allies.
"By exposing the TDP, the motion has improved our stock
in Andhra Pradesh. In the next elections, we need to pick
up more seats from some states to offset our near zero presence
in others," says a senior Congress leader.
In the Rajya Sabha, the Government initially robbed the
Opposition of the pleasure of savouring its numerical superiority.
In a dramatic move last Thursday it associated with the Rule
170 motion that entails voting, catching the left parties
off-guard. However, by endorsing the motion the Government
also committed itself to taking certain steps under Article
355. The article decrees it shall be "the duty of the
Union to protect every state against aggression and internal
disturbance and to ensure that the government of every state
is carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution".
"By associating with the motion the Government has
implicitly admitted that the Gujarat Government is not functioning
according to the Constitution. Directives under Article 355
will have to be followed with Article 356 (President's Rule)
or Article 352 (Proclamation of Emergency). The Government's
action has opened doors for a judicial remedy," points
out CPI(M) MP Nilotpal Basu.
Whether the Government sewed up unanimity in the Rajya Sabha
to save face or to apply salve, for the first time in four
years of the NDA rule, the Opposition showed a cross-party
unanimity which may augur well for it in the future.
-Lakshmi Iyer
|
|
The parliamentary test may have been won by the Government but it had
to count its losses as well. After the continued deadlock in the Lok Sabha
and the hype outside over Gujarat ever since Parliament resumed the budget
session in mid-April, it has been a fight for survival for the Government.
It did survive, but its image was badly bruised. In the past, the BJP
could afford to brush aside Trinamool Congress leader Mamata Banerjee's
outrageous demands as the tantrums of a temperamental woman. But this
time, even the hitherto reliable allies began to play truant. In hindsight,
it is clear that some of the allies are dispensable but it would be naive
to assume that the coalition emerged stronger after the debate. If anything,
the vote pattern proved that many alliance partners had no choice but
to stick to the NDA despite the BJP's hardline posture on Hindutva.
The voting of the alliance partners was dictated mainly by their own
political compulsions. Ahead of next year's assembly elections in Andhra
Pradesh, the TDP could do little else but abstain. The alternative? Hand
over the substantial Muslim votes in the state to the Congress. The Trinamool,
still smarting from last year's rout in the West Bengal assembly elections,
had no electoral compulsions and voted for the Government.
|
SLING SHOTS
|
|
|
|
"The Congress president is an antique smuggler."
Prabhu Nath Singh, Samata Party MP
|
|
|
|
"Women being raped, what's new? Did this not happen in 1984?"
George Fernandes, Defence Minister
|
|
|
|
"Uma Bharati speaks like a Nazi volunteer."
Chandra Shekhar, SJP President
|
|
|
|
"Vaiko is a murderer, a terrorist and an anti-national."
Mani Shankar Aiyar, Congress MP
|
|
|
"Mulayam once had Mayawati dragged by her hair."
Uma Bharati, Sports Minister |
The NC's dilemma was somewhat akin to that of the TDP. Elections in Jammu
and Kashmir are due later this year and the party could not afford to
annoy the state's majority Muslim community. At the same time, the party
faced the risk of a double anti-incumbency backlash-being in power both
at the Centre and the state. But since it had no intention to antagonise
the Centre, it decided to abstain and sacrifice the ministerial berth
of Abdullah, who in any case is scheduled to take over as the NC chief
in the near future.
The DMK had in the past voiced its reservation over the events in Gujarat
but was forced to vote with the Government because it couldn't afford
to be seen on the same side of the political divide as arch rival AIADMK.
The Janata Dal (United) was anything but united. While party chief Sharad
Yadav is a member of the Vajpayee Cabinet, his Parliamentary Party leader
Devendra Prasad Yadav, sore over not being accommodated in the Cabinet,
decided to adopt the moral highground and abstaining despite being present
in the House.
Major parliamentary debates are usually covered live by Doordarshan,
but with the Government ordering the switching off of the cameras, viewers
across the country were deprived of the chance to see their elected representatives
indulge in doublespeak. In this case, the NDA leaders who spoke the language
of the Opposition and blasted the Narendra Modi Government for its alleged
inefficiency, but ultimately voted against the censure motion.
While the NDA's image has taken a beating, the debate has boosted the
BJP's morale. Having crossed the Lok Sabha halfway mark of 272 despite
the desertion of key allies-thanks to the trade-off with the BSP's Mayawati
which brought 13 crucial votes-party leaders will now be eager to put
an end to frequent threats being doled out by them. "Enough is enough.
Now the BJP will call the shots in the NDA," said a BJP minister
after the debate.
The obvious reference was to the TDP, Trinamool, JD (U), and NC leaders'
attempts to form an informal pressure group within the NDA to force the
Government to seek Modi's resignation.
The BJP has now proved to N. Chandrababu Naidu that his party is not
indispensable. So long as the TDP doesn't vote with its arch rival Congress-the
political equivalent of the Muslim League building the Ram temple-Vajpayee's
Government is safe. But only as long as the battle is fought in Parliament.
The outcome could be different if instead of the honourable MPs the people
were to decide the Government's fate.
|