|
|
|
SOFT TALK: Musharraf said last week that Pakistan would
not allow terrorist activity in PoK
|
For so long
the war was rhetoric, and in reality a faraway idea despite the military
mobilisation on the border. No longer. First the assassination of the
All Party Hurriyat Conference leader Abdul Ghani Lone in Srinagar. Then
Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee's chilling call to the army:
be prepared for a "decisive fight". Now ordinary Pakistanis
are smelling war.
The stock market crashed 70 points on May 22; since the militant attack
at the Kaluchak army camp in Jammu on May 14, the Karachi Stock Exchange
has lost 16 per cent of its value, wiping out billions of rupees in built-up
capital. The threat of war is reverberating in newsprint as well. By Wednesday,
evening newspapers in Islamabad, prone to sensationalism at the best of
times, were predicting the break-out of war within 48 hours.
 |
|
READY: Pakistani Army personnel man an anti-aircraft gun
at Karachi port
|
The Government, on its part, went into overdrive. President Pervez Musharraf
met with his Cabinet, the National Security Council, journalists and politicians-ostensibly
to chalk out a strategy to deal with the threat on the borders. In a turnaround
from the complacency that existed a week ago, he declared that the situation
at the border was "grim" and closer to war than at any time
since December 13 last year.
|
Musharraf and His Many Fronts
|
|
Jehadis:
The state within the state
Pakistan continues to be home to radical Islamist groups for whom
the liberation of Kashmir is worth a permanent jehad. Despite his
call to the mullahs to behave, Musharraf has done nothing on the
ground to contain the state-within-state of militant Islamism. No
Pakistani leader can afford to do that. That is why his Kashmir
mission is not at variance with the jehadi vision.
STRATEGY: If he has the courage,
Musharraf can close down the Kashmir cell of the ISI.Such a step
will cut the lifeline of jehadis operating in the Kashmir Valley,
which India will appreciate.
GEORGE
BUSH: Limits of patronage
The General has been playing the double game: patron with Uncle
Sam as well as host to Islamic terrorists. During the war against
the Taliban, Pakistan was so integral to US plans that Washington
pretended ignorance. It can't, any longer. Every western power is
aware that Pakistan has become the capital of terror. International
pressure is on, and the General is being asked to come clean.
STRATEGY: Visible action against
the Islamist groups that have made Pakistan their headquarters.
Musharraf can close down camps, hand over to Delhi India's most-wanted
terrorists.
ECONOMY: Bleeding red
The economy is in a shambles. As war became a possibility, the Karachi
Stock Exchange almost crashed. Pakistan can't foot the bill for
a long war with India.
STRATEGY: Come clean and Musharraf
can again bargain for more aid from Washington.
MILITARY: Hidden agenda
The ISI is still involved with jehadis. Recent terrorist operations
in Kashmir show that the middle-rung of the ISI is at odds with
Islamabad.
STRATEGY: The General can purge
the fundamentalist elements in the armed forces.
|
The deployment of the 6th and 39th Mountain Divisions of the Indian Army
in Srinagar has put paid to the recent prediction that India would pull
back its troops from the border. "The movement of the eastern army
divisions to the western borders of India points to the fact that India
really is preparing for war," says a military commander. Ordinary
Pakistanis, though tired of an almost continuous state of siege since
September 11, are not backing away. "Karachi is very far from Kashmir,"
says Kashif Hanif, a mechanic from Karachi's Orangi slum. "But if
the Indians do anything to Pakistan, we will also fight for Kashmir,"
declares this clean-shaven 22-year-old who, in a back-to-front baseball
cap, is a far cry from your average fanatic.
The political opposition to Musharraf-united under the banner of the
Alliance for Restoration of Democracy (ARD) and the Muttaheda Majlis-e-Amal-refused
to meet the president for consultations. However, all parties issued a
joint communique asking India to desist from "any aggression against
Pakistan", and ARD chief Nawabzada Nasrullah has declared support
for the Pakistani Army in case of a war.
The public mood to a large extent is conditioned by the media. "India's
response has been arrogantly negative and self-righteous," said Dawn
in an editorial on May 21 after Pakistan's high commissioner to Delhi
was expelled. Many in Pakistan also see the upcoming elections in Kashmir
as an attempt by India to "hoodwink world opinion" about the
situation there. "Attacking Pakistan will not solve India's problems
in Kashmir," says Arif Mughal, a Kashmiri activist in Muzaffarabad.
The Pakistani military brass is now bracing itself for "some sort
of action" from India. Diplomatic activity has also been stepped
up. Foreign Minister Abdus Sattar has been in touch with diplomats in
the European Union. Islamabad has kept UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan
updated and there are reports that it might approach the UN Security Council.
"If hostilities do break out, there will be immense pressure on India
to accept international monitors along the Line of Control," says
a Foreign Office source.
More optimistically, there are signs that Musharraf's Government may
finally be ready to change a decade-long official military policy on Kashmir.
A senior journalist who attended a consultative meeting with the president
in Islamabad said that the General seemed to be attempting to elicit support
for the change, which would in effect mean preventing militants from crossing
the Line of Control. "It seems that the Americans and the Europeans
have told Pakistan that for war to be averted, guerrillas going across
must be stopped," says the journalist, who asked not to be identified.
And it also seems quite clear that the decision to act on this has already
been taken. "General Musharraf told us that the western powers have
said they would know immediately if practical steps are taken and that
he believed them. This, I think, is a direct result of an assessment which
concluded that American pressure by itself would not be enough to stop
India from waging war. The military seems finally to realise that a war
is not worth it."
History, though, speaks differently: realism has never been Pakistan's
virtue.
|