|
Movie Blues
A
kiss or a nude scene in a movie should not be cut if it is relevant to
the story ("Is Sex Ok?", August 5). The film industry rides
on the likes and dislikes of the people, so why should a censor board
decide what we see? Rating the movies rather than censoring them is the
democratic way-let the viewer choose what he wants to see. Moreover, it
is only right that half of the board's members should be young. Youthful
intelligence is appreciated in various fields around the world. Can't
they judge and rate the movies too?
Sreenivasa Kumar Hari, on e-mail
I have been a member of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC)
for more than a year. Members are chosen from a broad spectrum of society
and include lawyers, businesspeople, chartered accountants and other professionals
as well as film personalities. They represent the mass audience and its
opinion and taste.
Sunil Agrawal, Mumbai
The issues on censorship raised by Vijay Anand are not confined to sex
on screen. Filmmakers like Anand Patwardhan had to suffer for making films
on nuclear weapons and communalism. The approach of the CBFC to sensitive
issues suppresses creativity and meaningful art.
Akhilesh Kumar Sah, Uttar Pradesh
Sex is definitely okay. Those who do not know the ABC of making movies
have no right to be in the CBFC. In any case, the board has not been able
to stop the flourishing of C-grade movies in the south.
Bal Govind, on e-mail
Will the inclusion of nudity and sex scenes make a film better? Such
an argument only covers up the desire for pornography. The filmmakers
should abide by the rules laid down by the CBFC as most viewers enjoy
clean family movies.
Rajiv Chopra, on e-mail
We cannot be expected to live in an era of movies like Bhakta Prahlad,
Sampoorna Ramayana and Jai Santoshi Ma. Cinema, like everything else,
has to change with the times. Vijay Anand's suggestion should be taken
seriously. One cannot question his stature or his contribution to Bollywood
through the films he directed.
Dushyant Mahant, on e-mail
In spite of stringent censorship rules, a good number of soft-porn movies
are screened during morning shows in the theatres, watched even by school
children. What have the moral police, who create a ruckus over the abolition
of censoring, done about it? This is doublespeak.
Anil Sood, on e-mail
It is ridiculous that the authorities should consider the Indian moviegoer
immature. Vijay Anand's suggestions were well suited for the audience
of a new millennium. Adults should be allowed to watch the worst of pornography
if they want to.
Kalyan Ghosh on e-mail
The CBFC's existing norms for certifying films are outdated. If these
are not overhauled, the forbidden fruit will ever remain sweet for the
filmgoer.
K. Chidanand Kumar, on e-mail
Vijay Anand's resignation draws attention to the need for scrapping
the rule- book, winding up the censor code and replacing the mothballed
system of certification with the US system of rating that permits them
everything-kissing, nudity, sex, violence-with a statutory warning.
Sushant Sachdeva, on e-mail.
The debate on sex and violence in movies will never end. Usually the
family watches a movie together. We need not ape the West and watch nude
scenes and listen to expletives on the screen. However, Bollywood dance
sequences sometimes border on the indecent and you are left wondering
how these shots escaped the censor's cuts.
D.B.N. Murthy, on e-mail
India is facing a drought and one should be discussing the problems
of the farmers rather than debating whether sex in films is okay or not.
Sabyasachi Ghosh, on e-mail
So long as we have impotent minds in the "Central Board for Film
Crucifixion", just forget about creativity and sex in movies.
M. Narasimha Murthy, Bangalore
The Government is being too idealistic in believing that morality can
be preserved by strict censor guidelines in an age when cheap pornographic
CDs are easily available and pornographic sites are accessible on the
Internet.
Madhu Agrawal, on e-mail
Mahesh Bhatt and Vijay Anand may be right about creativity and freedom
of expression. But the illiterate masses may not be able to differentiate
between realistic scenes and those meant to titillate. The cinema is a
mass medium with a larger coverage than the Internet. The CBFC may not
be doing a good job, but scrapping it may be a disastrous move.
Preeti Shukla, on e-mail
Readers are recommended to make appropriate enquiries before sending
money, incurring expenses or entering into commitments in relation to any
advertisement appearing in this publication. The India Today Group does
not vouch for any claims made by the advertisers of products and services.
The printer, publisher, editor-in-chief and the editor of the India Today
Group publications shall not be held liable for any consequences in the
event of such claims not being honoured by the advertisers. |