 |
|
ARTLESS: The twins and their paintings at the Watermans
Art Centre, London
|
"Contemporary art is failing to relate to
the common man. It has no personal relevance for people."
Amrit Kaur |
It is not
just the Indian shooters who are making a mark at the Commonwealth Games
2002 in Manchester. The redoubtable twins, Amrit and Rabinder Kaur, are
claiming their share of the limelight, this time with no tinge of controversy.
Commissioned to do 12 paintings for the Games, the twins courted a storm
of protest for their first work depicting soccer star David Beckham as
the Hindu deity Shiva.
Their recent exhibition at Watermans Art Centre in London, however, evoked
unmixed accolades. The paintings, which showcase their work since 1987
when they first launched as artists, includes 11 other creations the twins
have produced for the Games. The Kaurs were at pains to clear the "misunderstanding"
surrounding the controversial Beckham and family painting. The depiction
of Beckham, wife and former Spice girl Victoria and their son Brooklyn
as Shiva, Parvati and Ganesh drew a flurry of protests from some Hindu
groups. "The idea was to project how football players and pop idols
have achieved a god-like status. It was supposed to criticise the society
that has put ordinary people on a pedestal. There was no intention to
trivialise any religion," clarifies Amrit.
The Kaur sisters' works are rich in detail in the tradition of Indian
miniature paintings and range from £1,000 to £40,000. Each
painting takes 400 to 900 hours of synchronised work. Their themes too
break away from the established norms of modern art. The sisters prefer
to call their work post-modern. "Contemporary art is failing to relate
to common man," says Amrit. "It is becoming more confusing to
understand and in many cases has no personal relevance for people."
The twin's paintings are easy to relate to. Starting with the issue of
Asian identity in Britain, they have moved on to other political issues
of popular interest. So there's former US President Bill Clinton caught
in a devil's frame with several heads-each with the face of evil dictators
such as Hitler. "Clinton was the primary target as he was heading
the US at the time," they explain. The Kaur sisters' portrait of
Princess Diana was described as "rich in symbolism, poor in taste",
by a critic. So the uproar over the Beckham painting was hardly surprising.
But criticism has never deterred the Kaurs, who are now busy with a "Culture
Shock" series for Manchester City debating the relevance of the Games.
The most exciting challenge at hand is a re-interpretation of Victorian
paintings for the Leeds City Gallery. "These have depicted the Indian
Mutiny as a piece of propaganda. We plan to put it in perspective."
As they have done to many other themes.
-Ishara Bhasi
|