|
Being &
Becoming is a brave attempt at an overview of the history of Asian cinema
over the past 100 years. The history of the 20th century is of war and
revolution, independence, globalisation and the growth of the fifth art-cinema.
In a relatively short span of time it has developed from a novelty to
the primary form of entertainment around the globe. Although, like any
book that has such a broad scope you will be frustrated by what is left
out, where Being & Becoming works is in the ability to see the broad
similarities and refreshing differences. It shows us how Asian filmmakers
have responded to the collective convulsions that their countries have
been through.
There are lovely details about the idiosyncrasies of the early industries.
The all-glass studio in Japan was made so that the films could be shot
in natural light. The first film exhibition in South Korea was part of
a tobacco company's ad campaign. The price of admission? An empty packet
of cigarettes. The emphasis of this book is on the higher, art cinema.
 |
BEING & BECOMING: THE CINEMAS OF ASIA
Ed by Aruna Vasudev, Latika Padgaonkar and Rashmi Doraiswamy
Macmillan
Price: Rs 765
Pages: 580 |
In cinema, time and again we see the use of the past in the creation
of national ideologies and the constant reinterpretation of facts to fit
the political needs of the day. It is interesting to speculate on how
much of what we think of as national styles have been created by political
dogmas. In the nations that used to be part of the erstwhile Soviet Union
there is today a predominance of documentary and high realism films. This
can only be the legacy of the utopian documentaries shot to spread the
revolutionary message about things. Take Life On the Collective Farm.
It is full of smiling women riding tractors across the Steppes and still
having enough puff left to sing rousing songs and wave their arms about.
This may seem like a terrible stifling of what, say, Kazakh cinema may
have otherwise become, but not when you see what has happened in most
countries when state funding is removed. Suddenly being faced with market
forces for the first time, producers tend to slide towards the lowest
common denominator. Out go the beautifully shot montages of old people
watching grass waving in the wind, in comes melodrama, soft porn and guns.
Lots and lots of guns.
What is fascinating is the way so much great cinema has come out of
times of restrictive government policy. In China, the "Fifth Generation"
filmmakers have created moving and original works in response to their
experiences growing up in the deviating sterility of the Cultural Revolution.
The blossoming of Iranian cinema with delightful films such as Abbas Kiarostanmi's
Through the Olive Trees could only have happened after the removal of
the star system and the "cleaning up" of cinema at the insistence
of Ayatollah Khomeini. These examples go against the received ideas that
freedom from censorship and interference are the only way good cinema
can be produced.
 |
| SOCIAL FRAMES: India is an overwhelming image
in Asian cinema |
Countries that have emerged from colonialism are often obsessed with
finding a film aesthetic which is truly theirs. Many countries, Malaysia
and Indonesia for example, still struggle with this quandary. You can't
help but think when you look at the examples of countries that haven't
really bothered with that question and see how zingy and prolific their
industries are, that perhaps this is the wrong thing to be worried about.
Indian cinema, for example, as we know, just sang the British into submission
and then carried on as if nothing had happened. In fact, Indian films
crop up again and again in the histories of other Asian countries' cinema.
Any shortfall in production by a country and India is always ready with
plenty of product to fill the cinema halls. Like a horror movie of the
1950s, it consumes all in its path: "Run! Don't walk! From the Blobbywood!"
This realisation makes you think again about ideas of cultural hegemony.
We are all so used to waiting with depressed resignation for the inevitable
global takeover of American culture, feeling that it is only a matter
of time before everyone succumbs to the addictive ingredients in KFC and
the satisfying bounce only delivered by a new pair of Nike Airs. It pleases
me no end to find that it has actually been Indians all along who have
been getting the good people of Asia to give up their game plan to groove
to a bangra beat. But then, let's not forget the horrific effect the influence
Kung Fu films had on Indian cinema during the 1980s.
Trying to find a national style is like trying to insist on pure racial
bloodlines. The history of the world is the constant mixing of cultures
and peoples. Nothing exists in isolation. Any outside influence becomes
Asianised pretty damn smartish anyway. Film culture moves like weather
systems around the globe. The real message of this book though is, if
you want to make a film you will however impossible it may seem.
 
|