 |
|
|
| SELLING POINT:
Hero Honda (top) will bank on Sourav Ganguly, while Samsung has been
forced to take off its ad |
For most
Indians, it's a game. For corporate India, it's a hot commodity, which,
ever since the controversy over player contracts, has only become hotter.
A last-minute settlement may have allowed the Champions Trophy in Sri
Lanka to proceed sedately but the controversy and the BCCI-ICC row has
already thrown sponsors' plans awry. Ravinder Zutshi, vice-president,
Samsung India-which has seven top Indian cricketers appearing in its ads-says
the manner in which the controversy is settled will "have a significant
bearing on brand endorsement by cricketers in the future".
An attempt by the ICC to prevent its official sponsor, South African
Airways, from being "ambushed" has left the Indian team without
a sponsor after Sahara pulled out. Says Sanjay Lal, executive director,
Percept D'Mark, Sahara's agency: "Forget the money that has been
invested. For Sahara, it is an opportunity lost."
With the ongoing Champions Trophy and World Cup 2003 in mind, Indian
firms were in campaign mode. Samsung, LG, MRF and Colgate had signed up
new cricketers. Pepsi, Coca-Cola and Fiat were putting together mega-budget
ad campaigns. Now they are playing half-cock, waiting and watching. Most
have decided to abide by the ICC contract for the Sri Lankan tour. The
"Team Samsung" campaign, for instance, has been taken off.
But trouble will surely follow because cricket is a substantial ad-spend
area. Industry spend on the game has been rising exponentially. In 1996,
the year the World Cup was held in India, it (including ads, endorsements
and sponsorships) was Rs 50 crore. By the next World Cup-England, 1999-it
had risen to Rs 200 crore. Next year, it is likely to touch Rs 1,000 crore.
Investment in cricket makes perfect business sense. Says Atul Sobti,
senior vice-president, Hero Honda: "Cricket is the only sport where
India can be No. 1 and hence the pull." A recent four-metro survey
carried out by Indica Research rated Sachin Tendulkar the top celebrity
endorser-bigger than actors Madhuri Dixit, Shah Rukh Khan or Amitabh Bachchan.
Says B. Narayanswamy, head of Indica: "Tendulkar is the only real
hero India seems to have."
 |
| STAR APPEAL:
A market survey rated Tendulkar as the top celebrity endorser |
When LG tested the waters during the 1999 World Cup, it found its brand
awareness zooming. Brand recall rose from 15 per cent to 35 per cent immediately
after the Cup. Sales in April-June 1999 were 174 per cent higher than
the corresponding period in 1998. Convinced, LG happily paid an estimated
Rs 145 crore to be the ICC's "global partner" till World Cup
2007.
The ICC's contracts with its official sponsors, who paid a premium for
the ambush clauses, run for the 2003 and 2007 Cups and for the 2002, 2004
and 2006 Champions Trophies. They restrict rival endorsements from players
during a tour and for 30 days before and after. For the ongoing Champions
Trophy, the Indian team has got the ICC to pare the 30-day period to 18-but
the problem is bound to return. For the players, this could potentially
mean three months of no endorsements in a World Cup year. Lal terms this
"very restrictive".
Nevertheless, if the ICC has its way the impact will be significant.
Ambush marketing will simply die. In 1996, Pepsi's "Nothing official
about it" campaign featuring top cricketers won more mileage than
official sponsors Coke at one-fourth the price.
If the ambush marketing clause is successfully pushed through, a company
that buys the ICC event sponsorship rights will have a virtual ad monopoly
in its line of business. Cricketers will see endorsement incomes fall.
Yet a lawyer warns that, barring the unpredictable, "a court of law
could uphold a petition by cricketers accusing the ICC of restricting
their trade".
Some sponsors also make the "nationalist" point. The ICC is
supposed to sign 12 official sponsors for the 2003 and 2007 World Cups.
So far it has found only four, three of them Indian. Seventy-five per
cent of cricket revenue comes from India but it goes into the ICC coffers
and is used to promote cricket around the world. "Shouldn't Indian
sentiment be respected?" asks one cricket agent. Patriotism, it seems,
is now the last refuge of the sponsor.
|