Goodwill
becomes the new buzzword as pomp and show take a backseat in the
Diwali celebrations of the diaspora.
WEB
ONLY FEATURES
In the perennial
battleground of Iraq lies a vibrant society which was once the hope and
pride of the Middle East. India Today's
Ashok Malik travels to the
dream that died. Guns
and Gaiety
INDIA
TODAY CONCLAVE
The
Conclave concludes on a high note. Al Gore, Stanley Fischer and other world
leaders listen and are heard. Catch up on the highlights. Take
me to Conclave now
CARE
TODAY
INDIA
TODAY HINDI
CURRENT
ISSUE NOVEMBER 11, 2002
ECONOMY: GUEST COLUMN
Trouble at the Helm
I
have been a member of three governments (Rajiv Gandhi, P.V. Narasimha
Rao and the United Front). I have also watched from close quarters three
governments (V.P. Singh, Chandra Shekhar and A.B. Vajpayee). And I wonder
if there is not something in our system of government that results in
the engine first stalling, then sputtering and finally dying out. Recall
that none of the other prime ministers
By P. Chidambaram
Vajpayee is still in office was able to
win the election that followed for his party. Re-election is a mountain
that seems nearly impassable, and that is why the achievements of Digvijay
Singh and N. Chandrababu Naidu are quite extraordinary. Vajpayee did win
a re-election of sorts in 1999 but, in my view, that was a seamless continuation
of the earlier election in 1998. Few people doubt that Vajpayee will go
the same way as his predecessors. The irony is that even without statutory
term limits (as in the US) Indian prime ministers have become one-term
chief executives.
In the case of the Vajpayee Government I think we can even point to the
exact date when the last act opened. On February 28, 2002, while an insecure
finance minister in Delhi spelt out his recipe for disaster, in distant
Gujarat the demons had gathered for a dance of death. Eight months have
passed and the nation has not recovered from that double whammy.
The office of prime minister is the cornerstone of the Indian government.
Chip away at that stone and the government will become a non-performing
government. In the past 15 years, I have observed that it is the souring
of personal relationships that triggers an attack on the prime minister-in-office.
If Arun Nehru, Arun Singh and V.P. Singh (the three persons Rajiv trusted
most at the beginning) had not betrayed personal ambition, Rajiv would
have weathered the Bofors storm. Rao's bete noire was Arjun Singh, and
it were the party dissidents who cut the ground from under him after the
demolition of the Babri Masjid. V.P. Singh's nemesis was Chandra Shekhar
who never forgave Singh for denying him the prime minister's office. Ultimately,
when Shekhar got his chance, he blew it by his inability to maintain a
difficult relationship with Rajiv. For all the attempts to hide their
differences, the relationship between Vajpayee and L.K. Advani has entered
a decisive phase. One of them has to yield to the other. In the meanwhile,
the Government will remain in deep slumber.
BEATING A RETREAT: Prime Minister
Vajpayee
The engine sputters when the prime minister is unable to wield his authority.
The celebrated power to reshuffle the Cabinet is largely a myth. Despite
having an unprecedented number of MPs on the treasury benches, Rajiv could
not do better than fit square pegs in round holes: Buta Singh in home,
P. Shivshanker in external affairs and, lamentably, N.D. Tiwari and S.B.
Chavan in finance. Rajiv's undoubted charisma was no substitute for performance
in crucial ministries. Rao used his power not to enhance his government's
performance but to ward off threats. He seized every opportunity to throw
out people from the government and, if necessary, the party. Vajpayee
faces the same problem. Despite his stature, he is not the master of his
house. He could do nothing when Suresh Prabhu was pulled out of the Government.
He yielded meekly when pressure mounted from the Advani camp to make Advani
deputy prime minister. Vajpayee beat a retreat when the rebels joined
hands to attack the disinvestment policy. When economists pointed to the
crisis in the economy (growth down, jobs down, investment down), a bewildered
Vajpayee could only switch the positions of Yashwant Sinha and Jaswant
Singh. So, instead of one square peg in a round hole (Yashwant Sinha as
finance minister), we now have two.
The engine begins to die out when the prime minister stops dreaming
about the future. Vajpayee, I am afraid, has reached that stage in his
chequered life. The body is tired, the spirit is weak, it may be possible
occasionally to summon the energy to make a brave speech but it is clear
to everyone that it is the beginning of the end of his Government. The
signals will percolate down to the lowest echelons and everyone will simply
pass time. Vajpayee's Government has run out of ideas, and it is also
running out of time. Every state election will bring more bad news. In
this dreary atmosphere, it is scarcely possible to hope for big-bang reform.
We must be content if the oarsmen keep the boat afloat for the remaining
period with modest growth, moderate inflation and a manageable deficit.
I have for a long time pleaded for a fundamental change in the system
of government. A complex nation like India needs a strong, young chief
executive, directly elected, holding office for no more than two terms,
and who can dream big dreams and draw upon the vast pool of talent available
in the country to provide good governance. Until then, it is deja vu.