By
showcasing the glory of paintings in the story tradition from the
Mughal era, the Brooklyn Museum revives a forgotten art.
WEB
ONLY FEATURES
In a bid to divert attention from
the failures of the Congress ruled governments, Sonia accuses the Centre
of not providing sufficient help. India Today's Lakshmi Iyer reports. Shifting
Blame
INDIA
TODAY CONCLAVE
The
Conclave concludes on a high note. Al Gore, Stanley Fischer and other world
leaders listen and are heard. Catch up on the highlights. Take
me to Conclave now
CARE
TODAY
INDIA
TODAY HINDI
CURRENT
ISSUE NOVEMBER 25, 2002
SPORTS: SUNITA RANI CASE
Run For Justice
The Salwan report, available exclusively
to India Today, clears the athlete of doping but calls for radical changes
in the conduct of coaches, doctors and sports officials
By Sayantan Chakravarty
Sunita Rani, Indian athletics' "fallen"
princess, can afford a smile. Last week, a one-man commission appointed
by the Amateur Athletic Federation of India (AAFI) and headed by lawyer
Sushil Dutt Salwan, cleared the clouds of a doping controversy hovering
above the versatile middle-distance runner. Rani who won the 1500 m event
and was placed third in the 5000 m at last month's Asian Games in Busan,
South Korea, was stripped of her medals following dope tests in Korea
that returned positive results-she was said to have taken the banned nandrolone
decanoate, an injectable testosterone whose anabolic effects remain active
in the human body for a long time.
PHOTO FINISH: The report could reinstate Sunita's
lost honour
Now Salwan's exhaustive report, submitted to AAFI President and MP Suresh
Kalmadi and Secretary Lalit Bhanot (both have rushed to Monte Carlo to
take up the matter with the International Amateur Athletics Federations),
has a revealing tale to tell. After speaking to several officials who
were part of the Indian contingent and scrutinising a range of documents,
he has brought out the dubious manner in which Rani's tests were carried
out in Seoul, far removed from the testing norms laid down by world federations.
At the same time, Salwan has also called for radical changes in the
conduct of coaches, trainers, doctors and sports administrators in India.
He also criticised the casual manner in which the problem of doping is
generally dealt with. Kalmadi, while accepting the report, said, "It
was unfortunate that Sunita Rani had to suffer after performing outstandingly
at Busan."
HIGHLIGHTS
OF THE REPORT
Challenge
the dope test report of the Busan laboratories.
The
discrepancies between samples A and B taken after the 1500 m
event in Busan is internationally unacceptable.
The
figure of "6" in NG/ML appears to be overwritten by
hand.
All
instrument printouts carry wrong dates. This may be because
the reports are not genuine.
The same sample should
be sent to an International Olympic Committee-accredited dope-testing
laboratory immediately
SALWAN'S COUNSEL
SAI does not adopt scientific methods of testing. There is
no random testing.
India's dope-testing laboratory is not accredited by the IOC.
Athletes take drugs so that they are cleared just before a competition.
SAI and other federations have to counter this.
Short notice and no notice-testing are the best means to curtail
drug use.
Coaches and team doctors should be responsible for doping cases.
Sportspersons who have tested positive and whose appeal has
been rejected by the IOC should be summarily dismissed from their
jobs.
Our coaches should be trained to world standards.
Labs need to maintain high standards in order to earn the respect
of the sports community.
The food supplement taken by Sunita should be sent for analysis
to ascertain if it contains any contaminated substance.
Coaches should be research oriented. At present, they do not
carry out any research on athletes under their charge.
The report, available exclusively to India Today, mentions that tests
on Rani's first urine sample (A) on September 30, 2002 at the Dope Testing
Centre in Delhi were negative. It obviated the need to examine the second
sample (B). But now, Salwan insists in his report that a DNA test needs
to be carried out on the untested sample to prove beyond doubt that the
urine collected belonged to Rani.
Based on the September 30 report, Rani was cleared for Busan. She won
the 1500 m gold on October 10 and was taken away for a test to a place
where entry, under normal circumstances, should have been heavily restricted.
But it wasn't. Salwan spoke to journalists who covered the Games and was
told that almost anyone could have walked in and tampered with the samples.
Curiously, after the 5000 m event two days later, Rani was asked to
present herself before a panel. Among those present were chef de mission
Jagdish Tytler, Bhanot and Sunita's coach Renu Kohli. Objections were
raised about the procedure adopted for the test and the documentation
itself.
Here are some of the findings:
The B sample acquired on October 10 was not sent to a separate lab
for tests.
The difference between nandrolone content was stark-21 NG/ML in the
first case, 6 NG/ML in the second. This is not internationally acceptable.
Most of the data sheets of the Doping Control Center (an internationally
accredited lab with ISO 17025 rating) in Seoul did not carry dates.
One printout showed a date of "October 200", another October
16, 2001.
There is no proof that the printout relates to the dates when samples
were taken.
In the report, the same doctor has signed for different officials.
At one place the figure "6" in NG/ML has been overwritten
by hand, it appears to be "2".
The men who have carried the report to Monte Carlo are now out to prove
that Rani was framed. The Salwan findings certainly point in that direction.