India Today
    CURRENT ISSUE SEPTEMBER 20, 2004
 
   INDIASCOPE

   ROUGH CUT: KAVEREE BAMZAI
 

More than a T-shirt

I don't know about you, but if I hear Shekhar Kapur saying once more that when Spiderman takes off his mask in the future, it will probably be an Indian or Chinese face, I will sue him for intolerable cruelty. In the past two years, Kapur has repeated this statement in practically every city in the world which has ever hosted a seminar on entertainment.

And you know what? Bollywood still has not arrived in Hollywood.

Despite Aishwarya Rai's waxwork being installed at London's Madame Tussaud's, as a publicity gimmick for Miramax's forthcoming film Bride and Prejudice. Despite the Bollywood hoochy-koochy which western reviewers say seems to have been shoe-horned into Mira Nair's Vanity Fair. And despite the fact that Bollywood's most successful export, Kapur, has not made a film in the two years since The Four Feathers.

But Bollywood crossing over may well remain our ultimate fantasy, the eternal Bombay Dream. The truth is elsewhere. Madame Tussaud's "honour" to Rai probably has a lot to do with the brown pound-15 per cent of the waxwork museum's two million-strong annual visitors belong to the Indian subcontinent. Vanity Fair opened at No. 8 in the US box office in a week when the two-year-old Chinese film, Zhang Yimou's Hero, was a topper, for the second time in a row. And the $60 million (Rs 276 crore) The Four Feathers was one of Miramax's biggest debacles in 2002, earning just $18 million at the box office.

My point is why are we so eager to be one of the big boys of global entertainment? If Hollywood prefers Australian Baz Luhrmann's remix in Moulin Rouge to the Indian-born Nair's multi-culti reinterpretation of Georgian England, so be it. If US audiences feel more comfortable with all the po-faced wirework of Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, so be it again. And if Lagaan did not win a Foreign Language Oscar, at least it popularised the game of cricket.

Bollywood is not a fashion statement. It is a state of mind and it is doing very well in India and the diaspora, thank you. When it chooses to go international, it should do so on its own terms, not as a flavour-of-the-month appendage borrowed by US and UK-based directors who are doing to it what English designer Matthew Williamson did to the image of Lord Ganesha-convert it into a faddish T-shirt.


SEEDHI BAAT ON AAJ TAK

"I always wanted to play a villain"

Actor Pran spoke to Editor Prabhu Chawla on his roles and his experience of being Bollywood's legendary bad man.

Q. There was a time when no mother was ready to name her son Pran. Everyone was afraid of you.
A. I would have hated it if they had not been afraid of me. Their fear proved that I was doing my work very well.

Q. Your fee was more than that of a hero even though you played a villain.
A.
My fee was never more than that of a hero.

Q. You were smart and talented. Why did you choose to play the villain's roles?
A. I got the role of a villain in my first film. I worked in Khandan as a hero. But I couldn't sing or enact romantic scenes.

Q. Are you a villain in real life as well?
A. I was a villain only in films, not in reality. Whenever any actor plays a certain character, he tries to get into its skin. It does not mean that his performance depicts his real self.

Q. You cannot sing. It means your personality matches that of a villain.
A. I enjoyed my roles. I always wanted to play a villain.

Q. Is a villain necessary for a film? What do you think about the villains in society?
A. Society will always have villains. We cannot imagine society without them. As for films, our movies would be incomplete without them. If we don't show evil, how can we understand the importance of good? If there are no villains, how can someone become a hero? A villain is necessary to show the victory of good over evil.

Q. If you have to play the villain's role now, who would you choose as the heroine?
A. If it involves doing bad things, it does not matter who the heroine is.

Q. You are rarely seen in public nowadays.
A. I have retired.

Q. Do you boycott the film industry or does the industry boycott you?
A. I have said goodbye to the industry. I get offers even now. But I feel that if one is not able to give one's best he should not work.

Q. It seems you are unhappy.
A. I am a satisfied person.

CURRENT ISSUE
SEPTEMBER 20, 2004
 IN THIS ISSUE
COVER STORY

What Men Want

Libido In Knots

Squeezing Desire

Gujaratis And Their Bedtime Soirees

Sex On The Run
 
OTHER STORIES
  Numbers Game

Lost in the Valley

Sanyasin's Flag March

New World Order

Principal Arbiter

Back from the Brink
 
CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTION PRIVACY POLICY