Still No Clear
Winner
Continued...How have votes Changed Hands
since 1996?
Between the 1996 poll and
this election, a large number of votes have changed hands among the parties. The change
may not be directly reflected in the number of seats. But the panel method adopted here
allows a precise estimate of the direction and amount of flow of votes between the two
general elections.
The BJP alliance has gained new voters from across the
political spectrum. The UF has lost votes to virtually all the parties. Congress has lost
voters to the BJP but gained from the UF, minor parties and those who didn't vote in the
last election (together shown in the diagram as "Others"). While the UF's losses
to the BJP and the Congress are genuine loss of votes, its outflow of votes to
"others" is mainly a result of Laloo Yadav deserting the UF in Bihar. This
category also includes people who did not vote in the last election but who say that this
time they will vote for one of the three main alliances.
This is only the surface picture -- the net flow of votes
between the parties. Underneath the surface, things are much more turbulent. Take, for
example, the shift of 0.8 per cent from the Congress to the BJP. This is merely the
overall result of much larger vote shifts among the panel of voters: a 5.4 per cent move
from the BJP to Congress, just outweighed by a 6.2 per cent movement in the opposite
direction.
Much of the change is also a result of the different
alliances that have been thrown up since the 1996 election. A number of those making the
shift from Congress to the BJP are people in the panel who voted for
J. Jayalalitha's AIADMK in 1996 and will vote the same way
in 1998. But in 1996, the AIADMK was an ally of the Congress, while now it is an ally of
the BJP. Even though they haven't changed the party they are voting for, the effect is of
a shift from one alliance to another. Likewise, the split in the Janata Dal and the
creation of Laloo's Rashtriya Janata Dal in Bihar has diverted votes which would have gone
to the UF. All these changes appear as votes changing hands in the flow-of-vote model,
though in reality these are parties changing sides.
The panel survey can show whether manoeuvres among the
political elites actually lead to changes at the ground level. By having a record of
individual voting intentions in 1996 and how they say they are going to vote in 1998, it
is possible to figure out if they are going along with the leadership; whether loyalty to
party overcomes loyalty to an alliance. The evidence thus far suggests that it is indeed
so. Almost half of the swing to the BJP block can be seen to be the result of the
alliances that party President L.K. Advani has cobbled together over the past few months.
Which new party will new voters prefer? |
| Congress |
27 |
| BJP |
36 |
| UF |
28 |
| Others |
9 |
| Percentage of new voters |
New voters make up 2 per cent of the electorate and remain
outside the flow-of-vote model suggested here. Yet, they are a significant part of the
emerging political scenario, for the manner in which the new entrants make their choices
gives an idea of the shape of things to come. In this context, it is significant to note
that the UF and the Congress fall far behind the BJP in attracting the new voters.
Parties are
changing their Social Profile
BJP
The BJP seems to have widened its social base without alienating its traditional urban,
upper-caste and educated core. There is a big influx of new support from the OBCs,
illiterates and rural areas. The playing down of Hindutva rhetoric by the BJP and allies
also appears to have worked, with 8 per cent of the Muslims in the sample now saying they
would support the saffron coalition.
Women form one group that is showing less enthusiasm for
the BJP and its partners. They get 36 per cent of their support from men, but only 28 from
women. The allies get a larger support among the youth.
CONGRESS
The resurgence of the party has seen it attracting traditional supporters back into the
Congress fold. Whether apologising for the party's role in the destruction of the Babri
Masjid had any effect or not is unclear, but there has been a 9 per cent shift in Muslim
support back to the Congress. The survey also shows the re-emergence of a gender gap in
Congress vote.
The Scheduled Castes, in the past a major component of the
Congress rainbow coalition, do not show the same enthusiasm for the new Sonia-driven
party. However, the party registers major gains among the Adivasis.
UF
The splits in the JD and the subsequent fracturing of support have seen big changes in the
social profile of the UF. The survey suggests a large fall in UF vote among the OBCs as
breakaway factions in Bihar, Orissa and Karnataka attract voters from this previously
strong group of supporters -- a shift also reflected in the big drop in rural support.
Many Muslim voters appear to be heading back to the Congress after deserting it for the UF
after Ayodhya. Otherwise, the support base of the UF seems broad and stable, reflecting
the underlying regional strength of the coalition partners.
Is there a Sonia swing?
How
the Sonia factor affected
voting decison |
Switched to Congress
Makes a difference in nearly 30 constituencies |
5 |
| Made a difference to
voting intention |
5 |
| Know about Sonia but
this did not influence voting decision |
40 |
| Heard about Sonia but
did not know of her participation in polls |
18 |
| Never heard of her |
32 |
All figures in per cent |
The huge publicity that has accompanied Sonia Gandhi on her
short but intensive campaign is having a significant effect on the 1998 campaign. Although
most voters either hadn't heard of her or didn't think she mattered, 10 per cent
acknowledged that Sonia's campaign has made a difference to the way they will vote.
In all, 5 per cent said that they had switched to Congress
because of Sonia. A comparison of the voting intentions of our panel in 1996 reveals that
2 per cent could be shown to have shifted from non-Congress to Congress. This may not
sound like much, but a 2 per cent shift to Congress could see them winning more than 20
extra seats, seats that would otherwise have gone to their rivals. This certainly appears
to be concrete evidence of a Sonia-inspired swing to Congress.
There may be a broader swing, harder to prove, from people
who had become disillusioned with the Congress and were intending to vote for another
party, but who have rejoined the party camp when the Gandhi connection came to the fore.
The impact of the Sonia swing is particularly evident in
states where the Congress looks set to make seat gains with only small shifts in votes. In
Andhra Pradesh, Kerala and Maharashtra Sonia has had an effect which could result in big
seat gains for the Congress. In Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Bihar where the
Sonia show isn't playing as well, the Congress is a minor player in any case.
More |